Тегеран, Иран
Будапешт, Венгрия
Шираз, Иран
Будапешт, Венгрия
ВАК 5.4.4 Социальная структура, социальные институты и процессы
ВАК 5.3.3 Психология труда, инженерная психология, когнитивная эргономика
ВАК 2.3.1 Системный анализ, управление и обработка информации, статистика
ВАК 1.2.2 Математическое моделирование, численные методы и комплексы программ
ВАК 3.1.33 Восстановительная медицина, спортивная медицина, лечебная физкультура, курортология и физиотерапия
УДК 004.04 Ориентация процесса обработки данных
УДК 311 Теория статистики. Статистические методы
УДК 796.332 Футбол
УДК 316.6 Социальная психология
УДК 616-036.22 Эпидемии. Эпидемиология
ГРНТИ 77.31 Спортивные соревнования
ГРНТИ 77.05 Медико-биологические основы физической культуры и спорта
ГРНТИ 04.61 Социология личности и поведения
ГРНТИ 04.15 Методология социологии. Методика и техника социологических исследований
ГРНТИ 15.41 Социальная психология
ГРНТИ 27.43 Теория вероятностей и математическая статистика
ГРНТИ 77.00 ФИЗИЧЕСКАЯ КУЛЬТУРА И СПОРТ
ОКСО 49.04.03 Спорт
ОКСО 01.03.05 Статистика
ОКСО 32.00.00 Науки о здоровье и профилактическая медицина
ОКСО 39.00.00 Социология и социальная работа
ББК 58 Прикладные отрасли медицины
ББК 73 Научно-информационная деятельность
ББК 75 Физическая культура и спорт
ТБК 5 ПРИКЛАДНЫЕ НАУКИ. ТЕХНИКА. МЕДИЦИНА
ТБК 7 ОБЩЕСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ. ЭКОНОМИКА. ПРАВО.
BISAC COM018000 Data Processing
BISAC SPO015000 Football
BISAC SPO041000 Sports Psychology
BISAC PSY031000 Social Psychology
BISAC PSY032000 Statistics
BISAC MAT029020 Probability & Statistics / Multivariate Analysis
BISAC COM077000 Mathematical & Statistical Software
BISAC MED028000 Epidemiology
BISAC MED084000 Sports Medicine
BISAC SPO066000 Sociology of Sports
Целью этого исследования было определить приоритетность влияния COVID-19 и стадионов без зрителей на суждения футбольных судей, помощников футбольных судей, судей по мини-футболу и судей по пляжному футболу в Исламской Республике Иран. Для сбора данных использовались как качественный, так и количественный подходы. Качественный раздел включал интервью с 15 экспертами по судейству, в то время как количественный раздел включал футбольных судей мужского и женского пола, судей по мини-футболу и судей по пляжному футболу в Иране (n=339). После интервью разработанная исследователями анкета с 14 вопросами была распространена в электронном виде среди судей. Их спросили в целом о влиянии отсутствия зрителей на их выступление. Для выявления факторов и составляющих, влияющих на судей, был проведен факторный анализ с использованием программного обеспечения SPSS. Дополнительно был проведен подтверждающий факторный анализ первого и второго порядка (SEM) с использованием программного обеспечения LISREL для проверки компонентов. Наконец, выявленные факторы были ранжированы с использованием теста Фридмана. Было обнаружено, что стадионы без зрителей приносят пользу молодым и неопытным судьям, поскольку они могут более эффективно судить матчи. Формат матчей без зрителей также привел к меньшему психологическому давлению на судей, игроков и тренеров, поскольку не было зрителей, которые могли бы протестовать против ошибок или плохой игры.
за закрытыми дверями, принятие решений, COVID-19, судьи, зрители
1. Tamir I. There’s no sport without spectators - viewing football games without spectators during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13, Article 860747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.860747
2. Glebova E., Zare F., Desbordes M., Geczi G. ’If there is no football, then we have nothing to discuss’: a phenomenological study on football fandom and COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2023, 23 (5), pp. 373-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2023.133158
3. Parnell D., Widdop P., Bond A., Wilson R. COVID-19, networks and sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, 2020, 27 (1-2), pp. 78-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1750100
4. Webb T., Dicks M., Thelwell R., van der Kamp J., Rix-Lievre G. An analysis of soccer referee experiences in France and the Netherlands: abuse, conflict, and level of support. Sport Management Review, 2021, 23 (1), pp. 52-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.03.003
5. Glebova E., Zare F., Desbordes M., G´eczi G. COVID-19 sport transformation: new challenges and new opportunities. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 2022, 95 (1), pp. 54-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2022-0011
6. Glebova E., Desbordes M. Identifying the role of digital technologies in sport spectators customer experiences through qualitative approach. Athens Journal of Sports, 2021, 8 (2), pp. 141-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/ajspo.8-2-3
7. Reade J.J., Singleton C. Demand for public events in the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of European football. European Sport Management Quarterly, 2020, 21 (3), pp. 391-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2020.1841261
8. Dantas F., Borges A., Silva R. Impact of UEFA Champions League and UEFA Europa League on financial sustainability - case study of two small football Portuguese teams. Sustainability, 2020, 12 (21), Article 9213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219213
9. Herold E., Boronczyk F., Breuer C. Professional clubs as platforms in multi-sided markets in times of COVID-19: the role of spectators and atmosphere in live football. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (4), Article 2312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042312
10. Boyko R.H., Boyko A.R., Boyko M.G. Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2007, 25 (11), pp. 1185-1194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410601038576
11. Nevill A.M., Balmer N.J., Williams A.M. The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2002, 3 (4), pp. 261-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00033-4
12. Johnston R. On referee bias, crowd size, and home advantage in the English soccer Premiership. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2008, 26 (6), pp. 563-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701736780
13. Dawson P., Dobson S., Goddard J., Wilson J. Are football referees really biased and inconsistent?: evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English Premier League. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2007, 170 (1), pp. 231-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00451.x
14. Dohmen T. J. Do professionals choke under pressure? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008, 65 (3-4), pp. 636-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.004
15. Dohmen T., Sauermann J. Referee bias. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2016, 30 (4), pp. 679-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12106
16. Garicano L., Palacios-Huerta I., Prendergast C. Favoritism under social pressure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005, 87 (2), pp. 208-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053970267
17. Liu T., Garc´ıa-De-Alcaraz A., Zhang L., Zhang Y. Exploring home advantage and quality of opposition interactions in the Chinese Football Super League. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sports, 2019, 19 (3), pp. 289-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2019.1600907
18. Rocha B., Sanches F., Souza I., Carlos Domingos da Silva J. Does monitoring affect corruption? Career concerns and home bias in football refereeing. Applied Economics Letters, 2013, 20 (8), pp. 728-731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.736938
19. Scoppa V. Are subjective evaluations biased by social factors or connections? An econometric analysis of soccer referee decisions. Empirical Economics, 2007, 35 (1), pp. 123-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0146-1
20. Sors F., Grassi M., Agostini T., Murgia M. The sound of silence in association football: Home advantage and referee bias decrease in matches played without spectators. European Journal of Sport Science, 2021, 21 (12), pp. 1597-1605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1845814
21. Sutter M., Kocher M. G. Favoritism of agents - The case of referees’ home bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2004, 25 (4), pp. 461-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00013-8
22. Webb T. The future of officiating: analysing the impact of COVID-19 on referees in world football. Soccer & Society, 2020, 22 (1-2), pp. 12-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2020.1768634
23. Webb T., Gorczynski P. Factors influencing the mental health of sports match officials: The potential impact of abuse and a destabilised support system from a global context. In: Routledge Handbook of Athlete Welfare. Routledge, 2020, pp. 289-299.
24. Oboudi A., Ghahfarokhi E.A. The effects of 90 sport program on Iranian football referees. Sport Management Journal, 2021, 13 (2), pp. 341-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2021.117414.1307
25. Bonyadifard M., Ghahfarokhi E.A., Dehghan A., Jalali M. Developing a strategic plan for the referees committee of the iranian football federation. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/ssys.2022.1102.1754
26. Salehi H., Mohseni M. Anxiety level among Iranian football referees: The role of self-consciousness and coping styles. Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 2017, 7 (14), pp. 16-25 (in Persian). URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2655-en.html
27. Abdi H., Farahani M.J., Sajjadi S.N. A comparative study of Status Football’s Referee in Iran and England. Sports Management Journal, 2008, 2 (4), pp. 119-135 (in Persian).
28. Leitner M.C., Richlan F. No fans-no pressure: referees in professional football during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2021, 3, Article 720488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.720488
29. Pollard R. Home advantage in football: a current review of an unsolved puzzle. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 2008, 1 (1), pp. 12-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399X00801010012
30. Wunderlich F., Weigelt M., Rein R., Memmert D. How does spectator presence affect football? Home advantage remains in European top-class football matches played without spectators during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 2021, 16 (3), Article e0248590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248590
31. Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004, 55, pp. 591-621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
32. Nevill A.M., Newell S.M., Gale S. Factors associated with home advantage in English and Scottish soccer matches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1996, 14 (2), pp. 181-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419608727700
33. Agnew G.A., Carron A.V. Crowd effects and the home advantage. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1994, 25, pp. 53-62 (in Persian).
34. Goumas C. Home advantage and referee bias in European football. European Journal of Sport Science, 2014, 14S, pp. 243-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.686062
35. Unkelbach C., Memmert D. Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2010, 32 (4), pp. 483-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.4.483
36. Downward P., Jones M. Effects of crowd size on referee decisions: Analysis of the FA Cup. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2007, 25 (14), pp. 1541-1545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701275193
37. Pollard R., Armatas V. Factors affecting home advantage in football World Cup qualification. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2017, 17 (1-2), pp. 121-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1304031
38. Nevill A., Webb T., Watts A. Improved training of football referees and the decline in home advantage post-WW2. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2013, 14 (2), pp. 220-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.11.001
39. Pettersson-Lidbom P., Priks M. Behavior under social pressure: Empty Italian stadiums and referee bias. Economics Letters, 2010, 108 (2), pp. 212-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.04.023
40. George A. The perception of home advantage and its effect on selfconfidence from the viewpoint of female football players. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation. Cardiff: Cardiff Metropolitan University, 2015.
41. Almeida L.G., Oliveira M. L., Silva C.D. Uma an´alise da vantagem de jogar em casa nas duas principais divis˜oes do futebol profissional brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Educa¸c˜ao F´ısica e Esporte, 2011, 25 (1), pp. 49-54 (in Portuguese).
42. Leite W., Pollard R. Comparison of home advantage between level 1 and level 2 in women’s football leagues. Journal of Anthropology of Sport and Physical Education, 2020, 4 (4), pp. 9-13. URL: http://www.jaspe.ac.me/?sekcija=article&artid=162
43. Bryson A., Dolton P., Reade J., Schreyer D., Singleton C. Experimental effects of an absent crowd on performances and refereeing decisions during COVID-19. IZA Discussion Papers, 2020, Article 13578. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3669507
44. Dilger A., Vischer L. No home bias in ghost games. Diskussionspapier des Instituts f¨ur Organisations¨okonomik, 2020, 7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674876
45. Fischer K., Haucap J. Does crowd support drive the home advantage in professional football? Evidence from German ghost games during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sports Economics, 2021, 22 (8), pp. 982-1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025211026552
46. Follert F., Daumann F., Passon L. Zur Bedeutung der Fans im professionellen Fußball im Lichte der COVID-19-Pandemie. Sciamus - Sport und Management, 2020, 2, pp. 28-42 (in German).
47. Hill Y., Van Yperen N.W. Losing the home field advantage when playing behind closed doors during COVID-19: change or chance? Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12, Article 658452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658452
48. S´anchez A.J., Lav´ın J. M. Home advantage in European soccer without crowd. ´ Soccer & Society, 2021, 22 (1-2), pp. 152-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2020.1830067
49. Konaka E. Home advantage of European major football leagues under COVID-19 pandemic. arXiv preprint, 2021, arXiv:2101.00457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.00457
50. McCarrick D., Bilalic M., Neave N., Wolfson S. Home advantage during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analyses of European football leagues. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2021, 56, Article 102013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102013
51. Santana H.A.P., Bettega O.B., Dellagrana R. An analysis of Bundesliga matches before and after social distancing by COVID-19. Science and Medicine in Football, 2021, 5S, pp. 17-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1903540
52. Scoppa V. Social pressure in the stadiums: Do agents change behavior without crowd support? Journal of Economic Psychology, 2021, 82, Article 102344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102344
53. Benz L.S., Lopez M.J. Estimating the change in soccer’s home advantage during the Covid-19 pandemic using bivariate Poisson regression. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2023, 107 (1-2), pp. 205-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-021-00413-9
54. Matos R., Monteiro D., Antunes R., Mendes D., Botas J., Clemente J., Amaro N. Home-advantage during COVID-19: an analysis in Portuguese football league. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18 (7), Article 3761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073761
